NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday strongly criticised the Uttar Pradesh government for intervening in a private legal dispute over the management of the iconic Shri Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan , accusing it of “hijacking” the case.
A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma questioned the state’s involvement, stating, “If states start entering private disputes, it will lead to a breakdown of the rule of law. You can’t hijack litigation between private parties.”
The court was hearing a plea seeking modification of its earlier order that cleared the way for the UP government’s temple redevelopment plan .
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal , representing petitioner Devendra Nath Gooswami , argued that Rs 300 crore was allocated to the state for the project without making his client, linked to the temple’s original founders, a party to the case, news agency PTI reported.
“How can earnings of a private temple be handed over to the state through an order in an unrelated petition?” Sibal questioned.
In response, the state's counsel said the government had created a trust to oversee the redevelopment and manage temple affairs, and that the funds would vest with the trust, not the government—under a specific ordinance.
The bench directed the state to share a copy of the ordinance with the petitioner and asked the relevant principal secretary to file an affidavit by July 29.
Earlier on May 15, the court had allowed the state to use temple funds for purchasing five acres of land around the shrine to develop facilities such as parking, toilets, and accommodation for devotees.
However, on May 19, Gooswami—who claims to be a direct descendant of temple founder Swami Haridas Goswami—challenged the redevelopment plan, arguing it was unfeasible without consultation with those historically involved in the temple’s functioning. He warned it could disrupt the temple’s religious and cultural fabric.
The Supreme Court’s earlier ruling had modified a November 2023 Allahabad High Court order that accepted the state’s development plan but barred use of temple funds.
A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma questioned the state’s involvement, stating, “If states start entering private disputes, it will lead to a breakdown of the rule of law. You can’t hijack litigation between private parties.”
The court was hearing a plea seeking modification of its earlier order that cleared the way for the UP government’s temple redevelopment plan .
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal , representing petitioner Devendra Nath Gooswami , argued that Rs 300 crore was allocated to the state for the project without making his client, linked to the temple’s original founders, a party to the case, news agency PTI reported.
“How can earnings of a private temple be handed over to the state through an order in an unrelated petition?” Sibal questioned.
In response, the state's counsel said the government had created a trust to oversee the redevelopment and manage temple affairs, and that the funds would vest with the trust, not the government—under a specific ordinance.
The bench directed the state to share a copy of the ordinance with the petitioner and asked the relevant principal secretary to file an affidavit by July 29.
Earlier on May 15, the court had allowed the state to use temple funds for purchasing five acres of land around the shrine to develop facilities such as parking, toilets, and accommodation for devotees.
However, on May 19, Gooswami—who claims to be a direct descendant of temple founder Swami Haridas Goswami—challenged the redevelopment plan, arguing it was unfeasible without consultation with those historically involved in the temple’s functioning. He warned it could disrupt the temple’s religious and cultural fabric.
The Supreme Court’s earlier ruling had modified a November 2023 Allahabad High Court order that accepted the state’s development plan but barred use of temple funds.
You may also like
Why Trump calls Autopen use the 'biggest scandal' since 2020 election
IMD Weather Today: After the Arabian Sea, now the mood of the Bay of Bengal has changed, the effect will be seen in 36 hours, new trouble from May 29..
PM Modi to visit Sikkim, West Bengal, Bihar, & Uttar Pradesh on May 29-30: What's on his agenda?
Kolkata Taxi Scam Caught On Camera: Man Threatens Foreign Tourist With 'Mafia Connections'; Says 'Will Break His Bones'
Canadian Citizenship Week 2024: Indians top the list as largest new citizens group
